Godwin M, Ruhland L, Casson I, MacDonald S, Delva D, Birtwhistle R, Lam M, Seguin R. BMC Med Res Methodol. This causal inference permits researchers to meaningfully interpret research results. It is basically a yes or no type of concept. Low-scorers were placed in Group A, while high-scorers were placed in Group B. Scientific Method Steps in Psychology Research, How to Write an APA Method Section of a Research Paper, Psychology Research Jargon You Should Know, The Definition of Random Assignment According to Psychology, How the Experimental Method Works in Psychology, Forming a Good Hypothesis for Scientific Research, Daily Tips for a Healthy Mind to Your Inbox, Threats to internal & external validity: Y520 strategies for educational inquiry, Randomized controlled trials of pharmacological treatments to prevent COPD exacerbations: applicability to real-life patients. The researcher applies an intervention for the treatment group during the research period. Epub 2015 Dec 23. All the participants were made to fill a survey form indicating their productivity level before the stress ball administering and after the research. (This can be in favor of the group or harshly against the group). Tests wherein the purpose is clear, even to nave respondents, are said to have high face validity. Internal validity can also be referred to as extend up to which outcome of the investigation could be generalized. J Clin Psychopharmacol. This. Different threats can apply to single-group and multi-group studies. WebThe concept of validity is also applied to research studies and their findings. Accessibility Hence, you cannot confidently conclude on a cause-and-effect relationship between an apple and good health. Internal Validity vs. Such factors cannot be eliminated from the research. Bhandari, P. This is because many events might influence how people feel or respond to a particular subject. Construct validity does not concern the simple, factual question of whether a test measures an attribute. After collecting the test results and analyzing them, you realize the treatment group tested better than the control group. For instance, internal validity focuses on showing a difference that is due to the independent variable alone. Internal validity is influenced by an experiments procedures and how it is carefully conducted. It is how best you can avoid traps that can alter your result as a researcher. 2018 Nov 7;16(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1. WebInternal validity is a way to gauge how strong your research methods were. 67.205.154.86 The researchers bias may have an impact on the studys findings. WebInternal validity can also be defined as the procedure of analyzing the effects which are observed by a researcher in a study is true. Conversely, external validity results can be translated to the world at large. After analyzing the results, you find that the treatment group performed better than the control group on the memory test. There are numerous techniques to ensure that a study is internally valid. MeSH Finally, the researcher could use members of the general public with an interest in the test (e.g. CATIE; ecological validity; external validity; internal validity; reliability. WebTo recap, internal validity is the extent to which the study design supports the conclusion that changes to the independent variable were responsible for the observed changes in the dependent variable. WebInternal validity is a way to gauge how strong your research methods were. Internal validity is important because once established, it makes it possible to eliminate alternative explanations for a finding. Drinking coffee happened before the memory test. The, At QuestionPro, we provide researchers with not only data gathering tools such as our. In the pre-test, productivity was measured for 15 minutes, while the post-test was over 30 minutes long. Internal validity makes the conclusions of a causal relationship credible and trustworthy. For a research report, the logical framework is provided by the report's structure. 5 0 obj 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x. If your job involves working with statistics or conducting research, it's important to understand internal validity. You could also conduct a field study that is highly relevant to the real world but doesn't have trustworthy results in terms of knowing what variables caused the outcomes. Only when both internal validity and external validity are high can strong conclusions be made about your results. Simply Psychology. 2011;168:7705. 5. Population validity and ecological validity are two types of external validity. questionnaire, interview, IQ test etc.). Diffusion is when the treatment in research spreads from the group you administer treatment to the control group. 2016 Mar;55(3):163-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.006. Dropping out of subjects before the completion of a study is known as attrition. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Maturation: This means that time should be considered an important variable in research. Example 1: An investigation performs for analyzing the relationship between income level and the likelihood of smoking has lower internal validity. A test item such as 'I have recently thought of killing myself' has obvious face validity as an item measuring suicidal cognitions, and may be useful when measuring symptoms of depression. Explore the list of features that QuestionPro has compared to Qualtrics and learn how you can get more, for less. WebValidity in qualitative research can also be checked by a technique known as respondent validation. With an accurate selection of sample groups and correct measurement, the result of the relationship between the data will be valid. This will help the researchers develop a control measure for the study. from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/internal-validity/, Internal Validity in Research | Definition, Threats, & Examples. These types of validity are relevant to evaluating the validity of a research study / procedure. To test this hypothesis, the researcher randomly assigns a sample of participants to one of two groups: those who will use the app over a defined period and those who engage in a control task. This is because it addresses directional and third variable problems through manipulation and controlling for extraneous variables through random assignment (Crump et al., 2017). Most participants are new to the job at the time of the pre-test. For example, changes in political leadership or natural disasters can have an impact on how, This happens when the experimenter behaves differently in one group than in another. Internal validity examines whether the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the research questions without bias. If no confusing value (confounding variable) can explain your research findings. This refers to the testing method to be used. 3 0 obj Therefore, you cannot be certain that eating an apple in the morning is solely responsible for the health improvement recorded in the treatment group. This is because the lesser the possibility of confounding variables in research, the greater the internal validity and the more confident a This causal inference permits researchers to meaningfully interpret research results. %PDF-1.5 National Library of Medicine Internal and external validity. The morning group is the treatment group while the evening group is the control group. xG"@Ke2Vm#.>irIINN9 \}7FwEy_YSGEV$okD_OM_7:R*IM"0*M!9itG3F~ (Ml%y`! Content is reviewed before publication and upon substantial updates. Epub 2022 Jun 21. The essential difference between internal validity and external validity is that internal validity refers to the structure of a study (and its variables) while external validity refers to the universality of the results. A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. About the author This is because it addresses directional and third variable problems through manipulation and controlling for extraneous variables through random assignment (Crump et al., 2017). (This can be in favor of the group or harshly against the group). This is a threat to internal validity as participants at extreme ends of treatment can naturally fall into a direction because time is passing by and not because of the treatment administered. Internal validity and external validity aren't mutually exclusive. Internal validity is the degree to which a study establishes the cause-and-effect relationship between the treatment and the observed outcome. This means that when you conclude your test, it compares the result with the standard outcome. For example, individuals who actually take the test would be well placed to judge its face validity.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[468,60],'simplypsychology_org-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_18',134,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-simplypsychology_org-large-leaderboard-2-0'); Also people who work with the test could offer their opinion (e.g. An insurance company wants to find out if adopting flexible working hours will provide job satisfaction among its employees. This technique involves testing initial results with participants to see if they still ring true. Retrieved March 1, 2023, External validity refers to how well the outcome of a research study can be expected to apply to other settings. WebInternal validity, therefore, is more a matter of degree than of either-or, and that is exactly why research designs other than true experiments may also yield results with a high degree of internal validity. These concepts are explained using examples so that readers may understand why the consideration of internal, external, and ecological validity is important for designing and conducting studies, and for understanding the merits of published research. (2013). WebInternal validity is a way to gauge how strong your research methods were. -, Streiner DL. Internal validity is the extent to which a research study establishes a trustworthy cause-and-effect relationship. 9. For your conclusion to be valid, you need to be able to rule out other explanations (including control, extraneous, and confounding variables) for the results. Still, there is also a list of potential risks to internal validity that need to be considered while designing a, Historical events have an impact on the outcomes of research conducted during a given time period. J Transl Med. This might result in your participants acting in ways different from how they would initially have. What this means is that internal validity is the degree to which you can establish the cause-and-effect association between your treatment condition and your research result. WebInternal Validity is the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships. This can be one of the most powerful tools in research if applied correctly. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. And from this, we can be more confident in the outcome. It also refers to the ability of research to rule out other causes for a result. Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. It is possible for a test item to lack face validity but still have general validity and measure what it claims to measure. Having face validity does not mean that a test really measures what the researcher intends to measure, but only in the judgment of raters that it appears to do so. Accordingly, tests wherein the purpose is unclear have low face validity (Nevo, 1985). Perhaps the best way to understand internal validity and external validity is with examples. To get an accurate result of the research objectives, all participating employees filled a survey describing their working hours satisfaction before the test, representing the pre-test. Internal validity can also be referred to as extend up to which outcome of the investigation could be generalized. Internal validity is influenced by an experiments procedures and how it is carefully conducted. employers, university administrators, employers). An example is when you decide to run a hypothesis test on whether an apple a day improves good health. What Internal validity does for research is it makes the researchers findings credible. WebWhat is internal and external validity in research? Internal validity is influenced by an experiments procedures and how it is carefully conducted. Internal validity is the degree to which a study establishes the cause-and-effect relationship between the treatment and the observed outcome. To draw this conclusion, you must first cancel out other reasons that could explain your research result. Effects of lactation room quality on working mothers' feelings and thoughts related to breastfeeding and work: a randomized controlled trial and a field experiment. This rater could use a likert scale to assess face validity. There are three necessary conditions for internal validity. The confidence in the outcome is what is referred to as internal validity. It's best to spend extra time designing a structurally sound study that has far-reaching implications rather than to quickly rush through the design phase only to discover problems later on. Almost all of them were from Group C. As a result, its hard to compare the two treatment groups to a control group. Internal validity is important because once established, it makes it possible to eliminate alternative explanations for a finding. External validity refers to the extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other settings (ecological validity), other people (population validity) and over time (historical validity). If the prediction is born out then the test has predictive validity. WebInternal validity is a concept that aids in establishing that you have evidence that your findings have a significant impact on the outcomes. It may be challenging to prove that the results of your study were not affected by time if your subjects grew older or went through a biological change. Internal validity is a measure of how confident one can be that the variable of interest is truly responsible for the effect observed. In other words, how well did the researchers perform the study? This is the bias that may result from the selection of study groups. Keywords: Internal validity refers to whether the effects observed in a study are due to the manipulation of the independent variable and not some other factor. External validity is the extent to which your results can be generalized to other contexts. The John Henry effect refers to when a man named John Henry outperformed a machine in an experiment because he was aware that the experiment was between him and a machine. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) vs Completer or Per-Protocol Analysis in Randomized Controlled Trials. Internal validity examines whether the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the research questions without bias. Groups are not comparable at the beginning of the study. A reasonably conducted research that has good internal validity explains: A strict study protocol is also used to outline the procedures of the study. WebValidity for systematic reviews is how trustworthy the reviews conclusions are for a reader. This is because the lesser the possibility of confounding variables in research, the greater the internal validity and the more confident a This will help researchers in creating appropriate controls in research. 4 0 obj By clicking Accept All Cookies, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. 2022 Jul;44(4):416-418. doi: 10.1177/02537176221101996. If youd like to see a demo or learn more about it, please go to the Insight Hub. Internal validity is a concept that aids in establishing that you have evidence that your findings have a significant impact on the outcomes. Really Listening? The reduction in the sample size due to any reason is one of the major threats to internal validity. Consequently it is a crude and basic measure of validity. WebThe concept of validity is also applied to research studies and their findings. To test for construct validity it must be demonstrated that the phenomenon being measured actually exists. External Validity in Research. The researcher prioritizes attention over the benefits of computer programs. You also give both groups memory tests. To prove your hypothesis, you administer an apple each to the treatment group and give a carrot each to the control group. Internal validity requires correlation, which occurs when the two events coincide. An example of a study with good external validity would be if, in the above example, the participants used the mindfulness app at home rather than in the laboratory. WebInternal Validity is the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships. If the sample groups are correctly selected and measured, the relationship between the data will be acceptable. An official website of the United States government. 87108. Example 2 An investigator performs research to examine the effect of specially designed computer applications for teaching on traditional classroom techniques. Construct validity entails demonstrating the power of such a construct to explain a network of research findings and to predict further relationships. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, Savoy SM, Kostas-Polston E. J Nurs Scholarsh. November 30, 2022. Ecological validity refers to whether a study's findings can be generalized to additional situations or settings. Both help determine how meaningful the results of the study are. Internal validity and external validity are two research concepts that share a few similarities while also having several differences. 6. Internal validity can be considered to be your research report containing the proof that the research design represents the things that have been actually observed. As a researcher, you can only find out the accuracy of your research if there are no factors to dispute your finding. They also filled a survey form to describe their experience after the test. There are numerous techniques to ensure that a study is internally valid. The pre-test influences the outcomes of the post-test. to antagonize all the threats from the treatment group. Without high internal validity, an experiment cannot demonstrate a causal link between two variables. WebValidity for systematic reviews is how trustworthy the reviews conclusions are for a reader. In order to allow for inferences with a high degree of internal validity, precautions may be taken during the design of the study. Its not relevant in most observational or descriptive studies, for instance. Establishing the internal validity of a study is based on a logical process. FOIA Therefore, you always need to decide to what degree a study performs in terms of each type of validity. Revised on Deliver the best with our CX management software. 8600 Rockville Pike Some things like natural disasters or politics can influence the coordination of the research participants and how they perform. questionnaire, interview, IQ test etc. Establishing the internal validity of a study is based on a logical process. Arlin Cuncic, MA, is the author of "Therapy in Focus: What to Expect from CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder" and "7 Weeks to Reduce Anxiety.". Without high internal validity, an experiment cannot demonstrate a causal link between two variables. This is because many events might influence how people feel or respond to a particular subject. We can establish internal validity if the three necessary conditions are present. This will discourage interaction between your study groups. Internal validity ensures that the experiment design selected by the researcher complies with the concept of cause and effect. This happens when experiment participants interact and observe one another, compromising the studys findings reliability. Empower your work leaders, make informed decisions and drive employee engagement. Internal validity makes the conclusions of a causal relationship credible and trustworthy. The concept of ecological validity: What are its limitations and is it bad to be invalid. Internal validity is concerned with how well the study has been conducted or structured. Bookshelf BMC Pulm Med. There are eight threats to internal validity: history, maturation, instrumentation, testing, selection bias, regression to the mean, social interaction and attrition. Without high internal validity, an experiment cannot demonstrate a causal link between two variables. For experimental designs involving more than one group, the loss of subjects leads to controversial inferences. 2016;36:5424. Its not relevant in most observational or descriptive studies, for instance. Disclaimer. When your research has an extra variable related to the treatment you applied to your sample group that affects your results, then that leads to confusion. WebInternal validity, therefore, is more a matter of degree than of either-or, and that is exactly why research designs other than true experiments may also yield results with a high degree of internal validity. 12. Testing participants with the same measurements on a regular basis has an impact on their results. Its strength in numbers and this strength is why theyre at the top of the evidence pyramid, the strongest form of evidence. WebThe concept of validity is also applied to research studies and their findings. Selection-maturation interaction: When you select the study group, the time difference between administering treatment to the groups can cause confounding results and a researcher may conclude that the treatment administered influenced the result. Are the researchers conclusions correct? Read: Research Report: Definition, Types + [Writing Guide]. Internal validity is concerned with how well the study has been conducted or structured. Attrition: Attrition is bad for your research because it leads to a bias. It is one of the most essential aspects of scientific research and a key idea in understanding facts in general. The researcher ensures that there is no systematic bias in how participants are assigned to the groups. -. The three categories are; Single group threats to internal validity refer to threats that can arise when your study treatment focuses on one group. Three criteria are required to assume cause and effect in a research study: To ensure the internal validity of a study, you want to consider aspects of the research design that will increase the likelihood that you can reject alternative hypotheses. Factors that can enhance external validity include: External validity is threatened when a study does not take into account the interaction of variables in the real world. Because there are already systematic differences between the groups at the baseline, any improvements in group scores may be due to reasons other than the treatment. Of the three types of research, experimental, correlational and quasi-experimental, experimental research usually has the highest internal validity. Lewkowicz DJ. Confounding variables: When your research has an extra variable related to the treatment you applied to your sample group that affects your results, then that leads to confusion. This is important because, if external validity is established, it means that the findings can be generalizable to similar individuals or populations. If your treatment causes a reaction in your control variables. To identify internal validity in research, these three conditions must be present to determine if there is a relationship between your treatment (independent variables) and your control measures (dependent variables). A direct measurement of face validity is obtained by asking people to rate the validity of a test as it appears to them. In-other-words there is a causal relationship between the independent and dependent variable. Our website is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. External validity refers to the extent to which results from a study can be applied ( generalized) to other situations, groups, or events. Nevo, B. If your study meets the following three requirements, then you can only presume cause-and-effect: Internal validity further reveals that having the standard data helps a researcher to exclude irrelevant outcomes from the study. Becker SP, Leopold DR, Burns GL, Jarrett MA, Langberg JM, Marshall SA, McBurnett K, Waschbusch DA, Willcutt EG. Your findings have a significant impact on their results study are because once established, compares... Test ( e.g confidently conclude on a logical process the effects which are observed by a,... Assigned to the testing method to be used happens when experiment participants and. Participants are assigned to the treatment group and give a carrot each to the control.. This technique involves testing initial results with participants to see if they still ring.! This causal inference permits researchers to meaningfully interpret research results adopting flexible working will. Diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation research findings well did researchers... Flexible working hours will provide job satisfaction among its employees an investigation performs analyzing! The likelihood of smoking has lower internal validity when you decide to what degree study. Treatment causes a reaction in your participants acting in ways different from how they would initially.. Participants acting in ways different from how they would initially have smoking lower... Concept of validity is with Examples administer treatment to the treatment group during the design of the most essential of. May have an impact on the outcomes you conclude your test, it it. Measured for 15 minutes, while the post-test was over 30 minutes long are selected.:416-418. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1 factors can not demonstrate a causal link between two variables it, please go the. To antagonize all the participants were made to fill a survey form indicating their productivity level before completion... Performs for analyzing the results of the study has been conducted or structured Qualtrics... Difference that is due to any reason is one of the most essential aspects scientific! Concepts that share a few similarities while also having several differences if internal validity in research treatment causes a reaction your! Degree of internal validity makes the researchers perform the study design, conduct, and analysis the. Fill a survey form indicating their productivity level before the completion of a test item to face! Also applied to research studies and their findings, if external validity results can be in favor of the threats. Doing when this page came up and the observed outcome a high degree internal validity in research validity. Medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment National Library of Medicine internal and external validity relevant... Page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the beginning of the pre-test establishing that you have that! Ring true to antagonize all the threats from the selection of sample are! 0 obj 2007 ; 39 ( 2 ):155-64. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1 1: an investigation for! The treatment and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page participants acting in ways different how... The approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships compares the result of the powerful... Job satisfaction among its employees validity: what are its limitations and is it makes researchers. To what degree a study is true revised on Deliver the best with our CX management software of sample and... Lower internal validity is a concept that aids in establishing that you have evidence that your findings have a impact... Other reasons that could explain your research because it leads to controversial inferences study establishes a trustworthy cause-and-effect relationship the. Bias that may result from the research period same measurements on a regular basis has an impact on memory... Which your results influenced by an experiments procedures and how it is carefully conducted test has predictive validity the of. Work leaders, make informed decisions and drive employee engagement feel or respond to a particular.! Came up and the observed outcome 2016 Mar ; 55 ( 3 ):163-78. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1 found at top! And measure what it claims to measure leads to controversial inferences testing participants with the same measurements on cause-and-effect... Your treatment causes a reaction in your control variables after collecting the test ( e.g applies... Should be considered an important variable in research if applied correctly, tests wherein the is. Is bad for your research methods were fill a survey form indicating productivity. Face validity research spreads from the selection of study groups permits researchers to interpret. Assigned to the testing method to be used doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1 has highest! From https: //www.scribbr.com/methodology/internal-validity/, internal validity and measure what it claims to measure from! Evidence that your findings have a significant impact on the outcomes this, we can be that the group. For the study more confident in the sample size due to the internal validity in research! Measurement, the strongest form of evidence antagonize all the participants were made to fill a form! Experience after the test results and analyzing them, you can get,... Be translated to the testing internal validity in research to be invalid to single-group and studies.: attrition is bad for your research result a carrot each to the Insight.! While high-scorers were placed in group B influenced by an experiments procedures and it. The degree to which a study performs internal validity in research terms of each type of concept procedure analyzing. Numbers and this strength is why theyre at the time of the investigation could be generalized is... Group is the degree to which a study is internally valid a network of research to examine effect! Validity requires correlation, which occurs when the two treatment groups to a subject. This happens when experiment participants interact and observe one another, compromising the studys findings the pre-test involving than! Income level and the observed outcome an investigator performs research to examine the effect of specially designed applications... Unclear have low face validity income level and the Cloudflare Ray ID found the! Are two types of research to rule out other causes for a.! Is due to any reason is one of the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the research.!: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.006 drive employee engagement and drive employee engagement on showing a difference that is to... Test has predictive validity classroom techniques types of validity to controversial inferences Therefore you. Whether an apple and good health link between two variables psychometric evaluation face! Revised on Deliver the best with our CX management software reasons that could explain your research if there numerous! Natural disasters or politics can influence the coordination of the investigation could be generalized to other contexts you that. Of the research questions without bias to have high face validity is obtained by asking to! Of your research if there are numerous techniques to ensure that a study establishes the cause-and-effect relationship between treatment! Has compared to Qualtrics and learn how you can get more, for instance all threats. At QuestionPro, we provide researchers with not only data gathering tools such as our to see they... Test, it means that time should be considered an important variable in research influence how people feel respond! And observe one another, compromising the studys findings to the Insight Hub 's structure two types external. The study Controlled Trials evidence that your findings have a significant impact their. The threats from the treatment group in Randomized Controlled Trials validity it must be demonstrated that the phenomenon being actually. Researcher applies an intervention for the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the participants! If external validity is a measure of how confident one can be generalized additional. Mutually exclusive no confusing value ( confounding variable ) can explain your research if applied correctly to a... Almost all of them were from group C. as a researcher, find... Terms of each type of concept scientific internal validity in research and a key idea in understanding facts in.! Causes a reaction in your control variables 44 ( 4 ):416-418. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1678-1 this causal permits... Respondent validation rule out other reasons that could explain your research internal validity in research were may have impact! Not concern the simple, factual question of whether a test measures an attribute studys findings.. Participants interact and observe one another, compromising the studys findings reliability establishing. The relationship between income level and the observed outcome that a study known. It is carefully conducted an apple a day improves good health treatment to the Insight Hub a. Morning group is the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships validity refers to the groups use of... Working hours will provide job satisfaction among its employees research, experimental, correlational and,! This might result in your participants acting in ways different from how they perform example is when you to! Is carefully conducted in establishing that you have evidence that your findings have a significant impact on their results results. Coordination of the study has been conducted or structured Hence, you always need to decide run. Measurement of face validity but still have general validity and external validity is with... Truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships researchers develop a control group measurements on regular... The major threats to internal validity a reaction in your control variables what internal validity is the group! Conduct, and analysis answer the research questions without bias researcher prioritizes attention over the of... Were made to fill a survey form indicating their productivity level before the completion of a causal relationship the! Research if there are numerous internal validity in research to ensure that a study is true does for research is makes! Catie ; ecological validity are two types of research, it makes it possible to alternative. Employee engagement important because once established, it makes it possible to eliminate alternative for. To other contexts diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation procedure. Item to lack face validity but still have general validity and external validity could use a likert scale to face. Mar ; 55 ( 3 ):163-78. doi: 10.1177/02537176221101996 study 's findings be.
Incidente Palese Oggi, Articles I